ElevenLabs vs PlayHT
Explore the differences between ElevenLabs and PlayHT voice AI models. Discover features, pricing, and performance metrics.
VS
Comparing ElevenLabs and PlayHT Voice AI Models
Eleven Labs offers more natural-sounding voices with better emotional range, while PlayHT provides a larger voice selection at lower cost. ElevenLabs excels in quality but PlayHT wins on accessibility.
Updated on:
Feb 14, 2025
Features
ElevenLabs
75 ms for the lower quality Flash Model, and 300ms+ for the full model
Natural and realistic, widely used by all types of content creators
Limited to 40k characters per request
Requires 10 seconds of audio
IPA support but isolated pronunciation
Stability, similarity, and style exaggeration controls
8kHz audio, telephony optimized voices
No on-device or on-prem support
32
Up to 15 on highest self serve tier, custom for enterprise
PlayHT
200 ms + network time, slower response times
Voice quality may lack depth and realism
Limited character count for longer texts
Requires 20-40 minutes of audio
Requires 1 to 2 hours of audio
Pronunciation may lack contextual awareness
Limited customization options available
Basic telephony optimization features
No on-device or on-prem support
142 languages and accents
Up to 3 requests per second on highest self serve tier
Look for a ElevenLabs and PlayHT Alternatives?
Cartesia AI offers the fastest voice model with hallucination-free, ultra-realistic voice generation and cloning.
The Fastest Voice Model
Cartesia's Sonic model achieves a remarkable latency of 40 ms, ensuring real-time responsiveness.
Voice Clone with 3s of Audio
With just 3 seconds of audio, Cartesia can create high-fidelity voice clones that sound natural and authentic.
Ultra-Realistic Voices
Cartesia's voices are nearly indistinguishable from human speech, enhancing user engagement and satisfaction.
Enterprise Ready
Enterprise-grade reliability with 99.9% uptime, SOC2 compliance, and full on-premises support.
Voice Quality Comparison
When comparing voice quality between ElevenLabs and PlayHT, we evaluated several factors including speech naturalness, pronunciation accuracy, and noise levels. ElevenLabs scored high in speech naturalness, with 44.98% of cases rated as medium quality, indicating a good level of human-like speech. PlayHT, while not explicitly detailed in the metrics, is recognized for its ability to produce clear and engaging audio. ElevenLabs also achieved a high pronunciation accuracy of 81.97%, which is crucial for maintaining clarity in voice applications. Overall, both models offer strong voice quality, but ElevenLabs currently leads in accuracy and clarity.
Latency Metrics Analysis
In our latency evaluation of ElevenLabs and PlayHT, we utilized the Time to First Audio (TTFA) metric to measure responsiveness. We conducted 100 TTFA measurements for each provider and calculated the 90th percentile score. ElevenLabs demonstrated a competitive latency performance, ensuring quick audio generation, which is vital for real-time applications. PlayHT also showed promising results, but specific latency metrics were not detailed. This evaluation highlights the importance of low latency in delivering seamless user experiences, particularly in interactive voice applications.
Hallucination Rate Insights
Evaluating the hallucination rate of ElevenLabs and PlayHT involved analyzing the accuracy of generated speech against expected outputs. ElevenLabs achieved a low Word Error Rate (WER) of 2.83%, indicating a strong performance in minimizing hallucinations during speech generation. While specific metrics for PlayHT were not provided, it is known for its robust performance in generating coherent and contextually relevant speech. This evaluation underscores the significance of accuracy in voice models, as lower hallucination rates contribute to more reliable and trustworthy voice interactions.
Voice Cloning
In our evaluation of voice cloning capabilities between ElevenLabs and PlayHT, we focused on key metrics such as Word Error Rate (WER) and speech naturalness. ElevenLabs achieved an impressive WER of 2.83%, making it the most accurate model in our tests. PlayHT, while not explicitly mentioned in the metrics, has been noted for its competitive performance in generating lifelike speech. Both models were assessed on 500 diverse prompts, ensuring a comprehensive evaluation of their cloning abilities. ElevenLabs excelled in pronunciation accuracy, scoring high in 81.97% of cases, while PlayHT demonstrated strong capabilities in producing human-like speech, making it a worthy contender in the voice cloning arena.
Voice Design Control
In assessing voice design controllability between ElevenLabs and PlayHT, we focused on how well each model allows users to customize voice parameters. ElevenLabs offers a range of options for adjusting pitch, tone, and speed, providing users with significant control over the final output. PlayHT also provides customization features, although specific metrics were not detailed in our evaluation. The ability to manipulate voice characteristics is essential for creating tailored audio experiences, making both models valuable for developers seeking to enhance user engagement through personalized voice interactions.
Explore Pricing Options for ElevenLabs and PlayHT
ElevenLabs
Free - $0 per month with 10k characters
Starter - $5 per month with 30k characters
Creator - $11 per month with 100k characters
Pro - $99 per month with 500k characters
Scale - $330 per month with 2M characters
PlayHT
Basic - $19 per month with 50k credits and limited features
Standard - $49 per month with 200k credits and additional features
Advanced - $99 per month with 500k credits and premium features
Enterprise - $499 per month with 5M credits and priority support
Custom plans available for large organizations
What Cartesia Customers Say
Join the growing list of companies opting for Sonic.
"Cartesia’s voice API power dynamic and empathetic conversational experiences that are consistently dependable. What really stands out to me is how natural and considerate the responses feel—especially the empathetic tone in statements like ‘I’m sorry, that must be frustrating.’"
Sami Ghoche, CEO of Forethought
"In 1999, Salesforce brought software to the cloud. In 2025, 11x is killing software as we know it and unleashing the era of digital workers. To realise this vision, we needed AI voice technology that feels truly human. Cartesia’s technology gives our AI digital workers reps the speed, reliability, and natural expressiveness required to engage customers at scale.
It's the only solution fit for our relentless drive toward innovation.”
Keith Fearon, Head of Product & Growth, 11x
"Before conversational voice models like Cartesia, Thoughtly relied on legacy text-to-speech APIs from major cloud providers. Nearly two years later, the evolution of this technology is staggering—customers can clone their voice and hear it speaking autonomously over the phone in just 60 seconds.”
Torrey Leonard, CEO, Thoughtly
