Updated Feb 14, 2025

Compare Cartesia and Google TTS

Learn about the differences between Cartesia and Google TTS in voice AI models.

vs

Compare Cartesia and Google TTS

Explore features like latency and voice quality for both models.

Latency
Cartesia40ms for the Sonic Turbo model, 90ms for the Sonic 2 model
Google TTS200 ms to 1000 ms
Voice Quality
CartesiaConsistently rated as more natural, expressive, and realistic in blinded human evaluations
Google TTSVoice quality is often rated lower, lacking depth and reliability
Character Limits
CartesiaInfinite request length
Google TTS5,000 bytes per request
Instant Cloning
CartesiaRequires 3 seconds of audio
Google TTSNot supported
Professional Voice Cloning
CartesiaRequires 30 minutes of audio
Google TTS20 to 30 minutes
Pronunciation Accuracy
CartesiaIPA support with strong contextual understanding
Google TTSOffers IPA support but less contextual awareness
Voice Customizations
CartesiaFully customizable voice with speed and emotion controls + synthetic voice mixing and design
Google TTSLimited customization options for voice adjustments
Telephony Optimization
Cartesia8kHz audio, telephony optimized voices
Google TTSStandard telephony optimization with 8kHz audio
Flexible deployments
CartesiaSupports both on-prem and on-device deployments
Google TTSAvailable on Android devices
Languages Supported
Cartesia15 languages with extensive dialect coverage
Google TTS50+
Concurrency
CartesiaUp to 15 on highest self-serve tier (60 parallel conversations), custom for enterprise
Google TTS300 concurrent sessions per 5 minutes and a limit of 3,000 requests per minute

Cartesia - Advanced AI Voice Capabilities

High-Quality Voice Cloning

Cartesia's voice cloning delivers lifelike, accurate replicas.

Ultra-Realistic Voices

Enjoy expressive voices that sound nearly indistinguishable from humans.

No Hallucinations

Experience clear audio without errors, ensuring authentic voice output.

Enterprise Ready

Enterprise-grade reliability with 99.9% uptime, SOC2 compliance, and full on-premises support.

How they stack up

Voice Quality Comparison

In terms of voice quality, Cartesia consistently outperforms Google TTS. Cartesia's Sonic model has been rated 4.7 in independent evaluations, while Google TTS scores lower. Cartesia's voices are noted for their naturalness and emotional sensitivity, making them ideal for real-time applications. The advanced state space model architecture used by Cartesia allows for better clarity and depth in voice generation, ensuring a more engaging user experience compared to Google TTS.

Latency Analysis

Latency is a critical factor in voice AI performance. Cartesia measures latency using the Time to First Audio (TTFA) metric, achieving a remarkable 199 ms. In contrast, Google TTS has a higher latency, which can hinder real-time interactions. Cartesia's Sonic model is built on State Space Models (SSMs), allowing for greater latency optimization compared to traditional transformer architectures. This efficiency ensures that users experience faster response times, making Cartesia a preferred choice for applications requiring low latency.

Hallucination Rate Review

Cartesia excels in minimizing hallucination rates in voice generation. With its advanced AI voice cloning technology, it ensures crystal-clear audio without errors, maintaining authenticity in voice replication. This is a significant advantage over Google TTS, which may produce less reliable outputs. Cartesia's commitment to high-quality voice cloning means users can trust the accuracy and clarity of the generated voices, making it a reliable choice for various applications.

Voice Cloning Showdown

When it comes to voice cloning, Cartesia leads the way with its ability to create an instant clone from just 3 seconds of audio. Unlike Google TTS, which has restrictions on cloning capabilities, Cartesia offers unlimited instant voice cloning. This advanced embedding technology ensures high-quality voice replication, preserving accents and voice quality even in noisy conditions. Additionally, Cartesia's voice mixing and design capabilities provide a diverse range of voices, making it a superior choice for voice cloning applications.

Voice Design Control

Cartesia stands out by offering unique features like emotion and speed modulation, allowing users to refine voice adjustments while maintaining a natural sound. This level of control enables users to customize voices to match specific needs, such as localizing an American voice to speak with a French accent. In contrast, Google TTS provides limited control options, which may not meet the diverse requirements of users looking for tailored voice experiences.

Pricing Comparison: Cartesia vs Google TTS

Free - $0 per month with 20K free credits
Standard voices - $4 per 1 million characters
Pro - $5 per month with 100K credits
WaveNet, Neural2, Polyglot (Preview) voices - $16 per 1 million characters
Startup - $49 per month with 1.25M credits
Chirp HD (Preview) voices - $30 per 1 million characters
Scale - $299 per month with 8M credits
Studio voices - $160 per 1 million characters
Enterprise - trusted by Fortune 500 companies

Trusted by leading enterprises. Speaking from experience.

Discover success stories
Sierra Logo
2X Solutions logo
arini logo
toby logo

Frequently asked questions