Updated February 14, 2025
Compare ElevenLabs and OpenAI TTS
Learn about the differences between ElevenLabs and OpenAI TTS in voice AI models.
Compare ElevenLabs and OpenAI TTS
OpenAI TTS offers natural intonation and high fidelity but has limited voice options. Eleven Labs provides more voice customization and emotional range, though with occasional synthetic artifacts.
Look for a ElevenLabs and OpenAI Speech to Text Alternatives?
Voice Clone with 3s of Audio
With just 3 seconds of audio, Cartesia's voice cloning creates lifelike, accurate replicas.
Ultra-Realistic Voices
Enjoy expressive voices that sound nearly indistinguishable from humans.
No Hallucinations Text to Speech
Enjoy accurate text-to-speech with no errors, handling complex transcripts and industry-specific terms effectively.
Enterprise Ready
Enterprise-grade reliability with 99.9% uptime, SOC2 compliance, and full on-premises support.
How they stack up
Voice Quality Comparison
When comparing voice quality between ElevenLabs and OpenAI Speech to Text, we found significant differences. ElevenLabs demonstrated high pronunciation accuracy, with 81.97% of words pronounced correctly, while OpenAI TTS achieved 77.30%. In terms of speech naturalness, ElevenLabs scored high in 44.98% of cases, whereas OpenAI TTS had a low naturalness rating in 78.01% of instances. Additionally, ElevenLabs had no detectable noise in 80.27% of its outputs, while OpenAI TTS maintained a similar standard with 89.46%. Overall, ElevenLabs provides a more natural and accurate voice quality experience.
Latency Assessment
In our latency evaluation, we measured the Time to First Audio (TTFA) for both ElevenLabs and OpenAI Speech to Text. We calculated the 90th percentile score from 100 TTFA measurements for each provider. ElevenLabs exhibited a TTFA of 150ms, indicating a quick response time, while OpenAI TTS recorded a TTFA of 200ms. This shows that ElevenLabs is more efficient in delivering audio output, making it a better choice for applications requiring low latency.
Hallucination Rate Analysis
The hallucination rate was assessed for ElevenLabs and OpenAI Speech to Text to determine how often the models generated incorrect or nonsensical outputs. ElevenLabs had a hallucination rate of 5%, indicating a strong performance in maintaining accuracy. In contrast, OpenAI TTS exhibited a higher hallucination rate of 10%. This evaluation suggests that ElevenLabs is more reliable in producing coherent and contextually appropriate speech, making it the preferred option for applications where accuracy is critical.
Voice Cloning
In our evaluation of voice cloning capabilities, ElevenLabs and OpenAI Speech to Text were put to the test. ElevenLabs achieved an impressive Word Error Rate (WER) of 2.83%, showcasing its accuracy in generating coherent speech. In contrast, OpenAI TTS recorded a WER of 3.36%, indicating slightly less precision. When it comes to speech naturalness, ElevenLabs scored high in 44.98% of cases, while OpenAI TTS struggled, with low naturalness in 78.01% of instances. This evaluation highlights ElevenLabs as the more effective choice for voice cloning applications, particularly in terms of accuracy and naturalness.
Voice Design Control
In evaluating voice design controllability, ElevenLabs and OpenAI Speech to Text were assessed on their ability to adapt voice characteristics based on user input. ElevenLabs scored high in context awareness, achieving a 63.37% rating, while OpenAI TTS lagged behind with a 39.25% score. Additionally, ElevenLabs demonstrated superior prosody accuracy at 64.57%, compared to OpenAI TTS's 45.83%. This indicates that ElevenLabs offers more flexibility and control in voice design, making it a better choice for customized voice applications.
Pricing Comparison: ElevenLabs vs OpenAI TTS
Trusted by leading enterprises. Speaking from experience.
Discover success stories
“Cartesia Sonic 3.5 has become one of the top-performing models for us by combining low latency with natural pacing… helping us deliver strong voice quality across a growing set of languages where other models often fall short.”
Lydia Zarcone
Voice Product Manager
“We didn’t switch to Sonic 3.5 because it was incrementally better, we switched because nothing else came close… we’ve seen a 2.9% lift in our conversion and a 12.2% increase in customer engagement.”
Akshay Ramaswamy
Staff Product Manager
Frequently asked questions
Company
Solutions
Capabilities
Company