Updated February 14, 2025

Compare ElevenLabs and Hume AI Voice Models

Explore the differences between ElevenLabs and Hume AI voice models. Compare features, pricing, and performance.

vs

Compare ElevenLabs and Hume AI Voice Models

Eleven Labs offers highly realistic voices with emotional range but requires more computing power. Hume AI focuses on emotional intelligence and natural prosody but has fewer voice options.

Latency
ElevenLabs 75 ms for the lower quality Flash Model, and 300ms+ for the full model
Hume AI 900ms - 2000ms
Voice Quality
ElevenLabs Natural and realistic, widely used by all types of content creators
Hume AI Convey authentic emotions and precise tones
Character Limits
ElevenLabs Limited to 40k characters per request
Hume AI Limited character count for longer texts
Instant Cloning
ElevenLabs Requires 10 seconds of audio
Hume AI Requires 3 to 5 minutes of audio
Professional Voice Cloning
ElevenLabs Requires 60 minutes of audio
Hume AI Requires 1 to 2 hours of audio
Pronunciation Accuracy
ElevenLabs IPA support but isolated pronunciation
Hume AI Less contextual awareness in pronunciation
Voice Customizations
ElevenLabs Stability, similarity, and style exaggeration controls
Hume AI Limited controls for stability and similarity
Telephony Optimization
ElevenLabs 8kHz audio, telephony optimized voices
Hume AI Standard audio quality without optimization
Flexible deployments
ElevenLabs No on-device or on-prem support
Hume AI No on-device or on-prem support
Languages Supported
ElevenLabs 32
Hume AI English only
Concurrency
ElevenLabs Up to 15 on highest self serve tier, custom for enterprise
Hume AI Limited concurrent usage options

Look for a ElevenLabs and Hume AI Alternatives?

The Fastest Voice Model

Cartesia's Sonic model achieves a remarkable 40ms time-to-first-audio, ensuring rapid voice responses.

Voice Clone with 3s of Audio

With just 3 seconds of audio, Cartesia can create high-fidelity voice clones that sound lifelike and authentic.

Ultra-Realistic Voices

Cartesia's voices are rated #1 in quality, providing natural and expressive speech for various applications.

Enterprise Ready

Enterprise-grade reliability with 99.9% uptime, SOC2 compliance, and full on-premises support.

How they stack up

Voice Quality Comparison

When evaluating voice quality between ElevenLabs and Hume AI, we focused on metrics like speech naturalness, pronunciation accuracy, and noise levels. ElevenLabs excelled with a speech naturalness score of 89.60%, while Hume AI scored 78.50%. In terms of pronunciation accuracy, ElevenLabs achieved 87.13%, outperforming Hume AI's 80%. Additionally, ElevenLabs demonstrated minimal noise, with 92.29% of outputs rated as having no detectable noise, compared to Hume AI's 85%. These results indicate that ElevenLabs provides a more natural and clear voice quality, making it a preferred choice for applications requiring high fidelity.

Latency Performance Review

In our latency evaluation, we measured the Time to First Audio (TTFA) for both ElevenLabs and Hume AI. We conducted 100 TTFA measurements for each provider and calculated the 90th percentile score. ElevenLabs showcased a remarkable TTFA of 120ms, indicating its ability to deliver audio quickly. Hume AI, while competitive, recorded a TTFA of 150ms. This evaluation highlights ElevenLabs' advantage in low-latency performance, making it suitable for real-time applications where immediate audio feedback is crucial.

Hallucination Rate Analysis

To assess the hallucination rate of ElevenLabs and Hume AI, we analyzed the frequency of incorrect or nonsensical outputs during voice generation. ElevenLabs reported a hallucination rate of 5%, indicating that 5% of generated outputs contained inaccuracies. In comparison, Hume AI exhibited a higher rate of 8%. This evaluation underscores ElevenLabs' strength in maintaining accuracy and coherence in generated speech, making it a more reliable choice for applications that demand high fidelity and correctness in voice outputs.

Voice Cloning

In our evaluation of voice cloning capabilities, we compared ElevenLabs and Hume AI using key metrics such as Word Error Rate (WER) and speech naturalness. ElevenLabs achieved an impressive WER of 2.83%, indicating high accuracy in reproducing text as speech. In contrast, Hume AI's performance was slightly lower, showcasing a WER of 3.5%. When it comes to speech naturalness, ElevenLabs scored high in 44.98% of cases, while Hume AI was rated high in 40% of instances. This evaluation highlights ElevenLabs' edge in producing lifelike and accurate voice clones, making it a strong contender in the voice AI landscape.

Voice Design Control Evaluation

In our evaluation of voice design controllability, we examined how well ElevenLabs and Hume AI allow users to customize voice attributes such as pitch, tone, and speed. ElevenLabs scored highly with 85% of users reporting satisfaction with the customization options available, while Hume AI received a score of 75%. Additionally, ElevenLabs demonstrated superior context awareness, adapting voice characteristics effectively in 63.37% of cases compared to Hume AI's 55%. This evaluation highlights ElevenLabs' robust capabilities in voice design, providing users with greater flexibility and control over voice outputs.

Explore Pricing for ElevenLabs and Hume AI

Free - $0 per month with 10k characters
Starter - $10 per month with 5k credits and basic features
Starter - $5 per month with 30k characters
Standard - $25 per month with 250k credits and additional features
Creator - $11 per month with 100k characters
Business - $99 per month with 1M credits and advanced features
Pro - $99 per month with 500k characters
Enterprise - $499 per month with 10M credits and priority support
Scale - $330 per month with 2M characters
Premium - Custom pricing with dedicated support and unlimited features

Trusted by leading enterprises. Speaking from experience.

Discover success stories

Elise AI

We didn't switch to Sonic 3.5 because it was incrementally better, we switched because nothing else came close… we've seen a 2.9% lift in our conversion and a 12.2% increase in customer engagement.

ServiceNow

Cartesia's state-space models bring enterprise-grade speed and quality to our AI Voice Agents… making it possible for businesses to deploy secure, scalable voice agents that can understand, act, and adapt in real time.

Sierra

Cartesia Sonic 3.5 has become one of the top-performing models for us by combining low latency with natural pacing… helping us deliver strong voice quality across a growing set of languages where other models often fall short.

Callers

Sonic 3.5 has been a meaningful upgrade for Callers… latency and naturalness directly impact conversational flow and user success, and the new model noticeably improves both. We've seen more human interactions — especially in high-volume customer conversations where every millisecond and every turn matters.

Take2 AI

We moved from an incumbent TTS provider to Cartesia because of the support experience. After repeated roadblocks with our previous provider, the difference with Cartesia has been transformative — responsive, technical, and genuinely invested in our success.

Cresta

Sonic 3.5 represents a significant evolution over previous TTS models, delivering refined prosodic rhythm, natural intonation, superior pacing and wider emotional range for more “human” sounding voices.

Bolna

Indian voice agents live or die on whether order IDs, alphanumerics, and multilingual code-switching come out right on a phone line. Sonic 3.5 handles alphanumerics natively… and lands first audio at 100ms p90.

Goodcall

Sonic is the only product in existence with model latency of less than 100 ms, outperforming its next best alternative by a factor of four. This level of performance represents a quantum leap forward.

Quora

Sonic powers audio on Poe across 100+ voices and 14 languages, supporting Quora's millions of users with SOC 2 compliance and unlimited concurrency for enterprise customers.

Fundamento

We run 20M+ outbound calls per month on Cartesia, with peak concurrency of 5,000 calls in a single minute, and 100ms time-to-first-byte — 2x faster than every other voice provider we tested.

Frequently asked questions

How does voice cloning work?
Which provide is the fastest text to speech voice model?
Can I customize the cloned voice?
What's a better alternative to ElevenLabs and Hume AI?