Cartesia vs Narakeet
Comparing Voice AI Models: Cartesia vs. Narakeet. Discover the strengths of each platform in voice generation and cloning.
VS
Comparing Voice AI Models: Cartesia vs. Narakeet
Cartesia offers ultra-fast voice generation with a latency of just 40ms, ensuring real-time interactions. In contrast, the other platform has a higher latency, impacting responsiveness.
Updated on:
Feb 14, 2025
Features
Cartesia
40ms for the Sonic Turbo model, 90ms for the Sonic 2 model
Consistently rated as more natural, expressive, and realistic in blinded human evaluations
Infinite request length
Requires 3 seconds of audio
IPA support with strong contextual understanding
Slider control for speed and emotion + synthetic voice mixing and design
8kHz audio, telephony optimized voices
Supports both on-prem and on-device deployments
15 languages with extensive dialect coverage
Up to 15 on highest self-serve tier (60 parallel conversations), custom for enterprise
Narakeet
Sub-second latency + network time
Less depth and reliability ratings in human evals
Limited character count for longer texts
Not supported
Not supported
IPA support, isolated pronunciation
Stability, similarity, and style exaggeration controls
8kHz audio
No on-device or on-prem support
90
Limited concurrent usage options
Cartesia - Advanced AI Voice Capabilities
Cartesia AI offers the fastest voice model with hallucination-free, ultra-realistic voice generation and cloning.
Low Latency Voice Cloning
Cartesia's voice cloning can create high-quality clones in just 3 seconds.
High-Quality Voice Cloning
Experience lifelike voice replication with Cartesia's advanced embedding technology.
Ultra-Realistic Voices
Cartesia's voices are nearly indistinguishable from human speech, ensuring natural interactions.
Enterprise Ready
Enterprise-grade reliability with 99.9% uptime, SOC2 compliance, and full on-premises support.
Voice Quality Comparison
In evaluating voice quality, Cartesia consistently outperforms Narakeet. Cartesia's Sonic model has been rated with a score of 4.7 in independent evaluations, showcasing its naturalness and clarity. In contrast, Narakeet's voices have received lower ratings, indicating less depth and reliability. Cartesia's commitment to high-quality voice generation is evident in its ability to accurately pronounce challenging content, making it the preferred choice for applications requiring superior voice quality.
Latency Performance
Latency is a critical factor in voice AI applications. Cartesia's Sonic model boasts a Time to First Audio (TTFA) of just 199 ms, significantly faster than Narakeet, which has a TTFA of 832 ms. This efficiency is achieved through Cartesia's innovative State Space Models (SSMs), which optimize latency far beyond traditional architectures. This means users can expect quicker responses and smoother interactions when using Cartesia's voice solutions, making it ideal for real-time applications.
Hallucination Rate Analysis
Cartesia's voice cloning technology stands out for its low hallucination rate, ensuring that the generated audio is clear and accurate. Unlike Narakeet, which may produce distorted outputs, Cartesia's advanced algorithms eliminate errors and maintain authenticity. This reliability is crucial for applications where clarity is paramount, such as customer support and healthcare, where miscommunication can have serious consequences.
Voice Cloning Showdown
When it comes to voice cloning, Cartesia excels with its ability to create an instant clone from just 3 seconds of audio. In contrast, Narakeet has more restrictive cloning capabilities. Cartesia's advanced embedding technology ensures high-quality voice clones that maintain clarity and authenticity, even in noisy conditions. Additionally, Cartesia's voice mixing and design features provide a wider variety of diverse voices, making it a superior choice for those seeking flexibility and quality in voice cloning.
Voice Design Control
Cartesia offers unique voice design controllability features, including emotion and speed modulation, allowing users to refine voice outputs while maintaining a natural sound. This capability enables users to create more engaging and relatable audio experiences. In contrast, Narakeet provides limited control options, lacking the depth of customization that Cartesia offers, making Cartesia the better choice for those needing tailored voice solutions.
Pricing Comparison: Cartesia vs. Narakeet Plans
Cartesia
Free - $0 per month with 10k free credits
Pro - $5 per month with 100k credits
Startup - $49 per month with 1.25M credits
Scale - $299 per month with 8M credits
Enterprise - trusted by Fortune 500 companies
Narakeet
30 minutes @ $0.20 per minute
300 minutes @ $0.15 per minute
1000 minutes @ $0.10 per minute
2500 minutes @ $0.08 per minute
10000 minutes @ $0.05 per minute
What Cartesia Customers Say
Join the growing list of companies opting for Sonic.
"Cartesia’s voice API power dynamic and empathetic conversational experiences that are consistently dependable. What really stands out to me is how natural and considerate the responses feel—especially the empathetic tone in statements like ‘I’m sorry, that must be frustrating.’"
Sami Ghoche, CEO of Forethought
"In 1999, Salesforce brought software to the cloud. In 2025, 11x is killing software as we know it and unleashing the era of digital workers. To realise this vision, we needed AI voice technology that feels truly human. Cartesia’s technology gives our AI digital workers reps the speed, reliability, and natural expressiveness required to engage customers at scale.
It's the only solution fit for our relentless drive toward innovation.”
Keith Fearon, Head of Product & Growth, 11x
"Before conversational voice models like Cartesia, Thoughtly relied on legacy text-to-speech APIs from major cloud providers. Nearly two years later, the evolution of this technology is staggering—customers can clone their voice and hear it speaking autonomously over the phone in just 60 seconds.”
Torrey Leonard, CEO, Thoughtly
